Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2003-006
Original file (2003-006.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
 
Application for Correction of  
Coast Guard Record of: 
 
 
 
    

 
 
 
BCMR Docket  
No. 2003-006 

  FINAL DECISION 

This final decision, dated August XX, 2003, is signed by the three duly appointed 

 
ULMER, Chair: 
 
 
This is a proceeding under the provisions of section 1552 of title 10 and section 
425 of title 14, United States Code.  It was docketed on October 28, 2002, upon receipt of 
the applicant's complete application for correction of his military record.  
 
 
members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case. 
 
The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he received two 
 
bronze  and  two  silver  clusters  for  the  American  Campaign  and  the  Asiatic-Pacific 
Campaign medals he earned during his World War II (WWII) service.   
 
 
The applicant stated that he discovered the alleged error after his discharge on 
May 6, 1946 and that the statute of limitations should be waived because he is still owed 
the awards.    
 
 
The  applicant  enlisted  in  the  Coast  Guard  Reserve  on  February  14,  1945  and 
began a period of active duty on July 30, 1945, when he was assigned to a cutter.  He 
served on the cutter until April 29, 1946.   He was discharged from the Coast Guard on 
May 6, 1946.  His discharge document shows that he earned the American Area Ribbon, 
Asiatic Pacific Area Ribbon and the WW II Victory ribbon.   
  
Views of the Coast Guard 
 
 
Counsel of the Coast Guard recommending that the Board deny relief.   
 
 
Attached to the advisory opinion, as Enclosure (1) was a memorandum from the 
Commander, Coast Guard Personnel Command (CGPC).  He stated there are no bronze 
"clusters"  authorized  for  the  Americana  Campaign  and  Asiatic-Pacific  Campaign 
medals.  He further stated that chapter 5.B.7. of the Coast Guard Medals and Awards 
Manual  provides  for the following:  "bronze engagement stars may be authorized for 
wear on the American Campaign and Asiatic-Pacific Campaign medals for operations 

On  February  26,  2003,  the  Board  received  an  advisory  opinion  from  the  Chief 

or  engagements  involving  actual  combat.    Silver  stars  are  worn  in  lieu  of five bronze 
stars." 
 
 
CGPC  stated  that  the  Coast  Guard  Medals  and  Awards  office  reviewed  the 
applicant's service record and found that, although he had been awarded the American 
Campaign  and  Asiatic-Pacific  Campaign  medals,  there  was  nothing  in  the  record 
authorizing him to wear bronze stars with these medals.  GCPC stated that there is no 
conclusive evidence from the applicant that he was awarded two bronze and two silver 
stars.  Nor, according to CGPC, is there any evidence that the applicant performed any 
service  (combat)  onboard  the  cutter  that  would  have  met  the  criteria  for  these  award 
elements.   
 
 
 
Applicant’s Response to the Views of the Coast Guard 
 
 
for his review and comment.  He did not submit a response. 
 

On February 28, 2003, a copy of the advisory opinion was sent to the applicant 

CGPC also noted the untimeliness of the application.   

 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

1.  The BCMR has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to section 1552 of title 

 
 
The  Board  makes  the  following  findings  and  conclusions  on  the  basis  of  the 
applicant's and Coast Guard's submissions, applicant's military record, and applicable 
law: 
 
 
10, United States Code.  
 
2.  The application was not timely.   To be timely, an application for correction of 
 
a military record must be submitted within three years after the applicant discovered or 
should  have  discovered  the  alleged  error  or  injustice.    See  33  CFR  52.22.      This 
application was submitted approximately 53 years beyond the statute of limitations.   
 
 
3.  The Board may still consider the application on the merits, however, if it finds 
it is in the interest of justice to do so.  The interest of justice is determined by taking into 
consideration the reasons for and the length of the delay and the likelihood of success 
on the merits of the claim. See, Dickson v. Secretary of Defense, 68 F. 3rd 1396 (D.D.C. 
1995). 
 
 
4.    The  applicant  stated  that  he  discovered  the  error  or  injustice  in  1946,  but 
offered no reason for not filing his application earlier, except to say that he is entitled to 
the awards.  The Board does not find this a persuasive reason for waiving the statute of 
limitations in this case.   
 
 
5. The Board further finds that it is not likely that the applicant would prevail on 
the merits of this claim, even if the Board were to waive the statute of limitations.  His 

7.  Accordingly, the applicant's request for relief should be denied. 

military record does not contain any evidence that while on the cutter, he was engaged 
in combat with the enemy, a requirement for being awarded a bronze star.  See section 
5.B.7.c.  of  the  Coast  Guard  Medals  and  Awards  Manual.    Nor  has  he  presented  any 
proof, other than his bare allegation, that he is entitled to these award elements for any 
other service.   
 
 
6.  Based on the length of the delay, the lack of persuasive reasons for not acting 
sooner to correct his record, and the probable lack of success on the merits of his claim, 
the  Board  finds  it  is  not  in  the  interest  of  justice  to  waive  the  three-year  statute  of 
limitations in this case.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

[ORDER AND SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 

 
 

 
 

        

 
 Felisa C. Garmon 

 

 
 

ORDER 

 
 
correction of his military record is denied. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

The  application  of  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  013  20  4146  (686-027)  USCG,  for 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Quang D. Nguyen 

 

 

 
 G. Alex Weller 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2004-135

    Original file (2004-135.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On his application to the Board, he merely noted that the Board should consider his application “in the interest of justice.” SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE The applicant enlisted into the Coast Guard Reserve on December 3, 1942, and began serving on active duty on March 17, 1943. He served on the ship until December 22, 1945, and was honorably discharged from the Coast Guard on January 8, 1946. As the JAG and CGPC stated, the applicant has provided no explanation for his failure to request the...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2008-204

    Original file (2008-204.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated October 22, 2009, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant1 asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he was awarded a Purple Heart for an injury he received when his ship, the USS CAVALIER, was torpedoed by a Japanese submarine on January 30, 1945. 2007-032, in which the Board ordered the Coast Guard to review the applicant’s record to determine whether he was entitled to a Purple Heart Medal...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2007-032

    Original file (2007-032.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The BCMR has jurisdiction of the case pursuant to section 1552 of title 10 of the of the applicant and the Coast Guard, the military record of the applicant, and applicable law. In this regard, the applicant’s military record shows the following meritorious service, conduct, and accomplishments: • On June 5, 1944, the applicant was authorized to wear the Asiatic-Pacific Area Ribbon. The Coast Guard shall correct his record to show that he received an honorable discharge.

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2003-106

    Original file (2003-106.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated that applications for correction of military records must be filed within three years of the date the alleged error or injustice was, or should have been, discovered. The BCMR has jurisdiction of the case pursuant to section 1552 of title 10, The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the submissions of the applicant and the Coast Guard, the military record of the applicant, and applicable law. The applicant should have discovered that he had not been...

  • CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2007-224

    Original file (2007-224.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. He also asked the Board to award him the Silver Star or the Silver Lifesaving Medal rather than the Coast Guard Commendation Medal that was awarded to him in 2004 for his heroic service in rescuing Army personnel on March 6, 1945. Otherwise a military award should be considered.” Since the applicant was on active duty and performing military...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2007-162

    Original file (2007-162.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He asked the Board to correct his record to show that he is eligible to a Good Conduct Medal, a Combat Action Ribbon, and any others to which he may be entitled. He alleged that he should be entitled to wear the Combat Action Ribbon because of his service aboard the USS Savage when it was attacked during a convoy, which “earned [him] one battle star.” The applicant made no allegations with respect to his entitlement to a Good Conduct Medal. Regarding the applicant’s request for a Good...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2005-005

    Original file (2005-005.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated June 30, 2005, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he was awarded a Purple Heart for an injury to his right knee during his enlistment from June 26, 1941, to June 27, 1946. SECNAVINST 1650.1G states that during World War II, the Purple Heart was awarded to members of the Armed Forces who were wounded or killed in action against an enemy of the United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000093

    Original file (20140000093.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Specific awards include: * World War II Victory Medal * Purple Heart * American Campaign Medal * Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal * Silver Star * Presidential Unit Citation * Bronze Star Medal * American Defense Service Medal * Prisoner of War (POW) Medal * Philippines Defense Ribbon 2. The FSM be posthumously awarded the Bronze Star Medal for participation in the Philippine Islands Campaign from 8 December 1941 to 6 May 1942 and the Purple Heart based on his death on 1 February 1945 while a...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2009-149

    Original file (2009-149.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated February 25, 2010, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, who was honorably released from active duty in the Coast Guard on March 13, 1970, asked the Board to correct his record to show that he was awarded a Bronze Star or Silver Star for his service in combat with Squadron #13 near Cat Lo, Vietnam, from Feb- ruary to December, 1969. Finally, the Board notes that the applicant was serving on patrol boats in or...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2005-031

    Original file (2005-031.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. On December 7, 1968, the Commander of Coast Guard Activities, Vietnam, recommended that the applicant receive a Bronze Star medal for his heroic service on March 1, 1968. of the Coast Guard Medals and Awards Manual provides that “only one award of a personal military decoration will be made for the same act achievement, or period of...